// API callback
jQuery111306593226878903806_1446510736660({"version":"1.0","encoding":"UTF-8","feed":{"xmlns":"http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom","xmlns$openSearch":"http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/","xmlns$blogger":"http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008","xmlns$georss":"http://www.georss.org/georss","xmlns$gd":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005","xmlns$thr":"http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0","id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1574330275867774277"},"updated":{"$t":"2015-11-02T22:49:59.456+11:00"},"category":[{"term":"Australia"},{"term":"News"},{"term":"Patentable subject matter"},{"term":"Law reform"},{"term":"Patent Office"},{"term":"US"},{"term":"Patent law"},{"term":"Computer programs"},{"term":"Apple-v-Samsung"},{"term":"Genetic technology"},{"term":"Smartphone wars"},{"term":"Pharmaceuticals"},{"term":"Appeal"},{"term":"Infringement"},{"term":"Innovation policy"},{"term":"New Zealand"},{"term":"Raising the Bar"},{"term":"Business processes"},{"term":"Interlocutory injunction"},{"term":"Obviousness"},{"term":"Politics"},{"term":"Public policy"},{"term":"Intellectual Asset Management"},{"term":"Innovation patent"},{"term":"Europe"},{"term":"Examination"},{"term":"Patent attorney profession"},{"term":"Patent litigation"},{"term":"Patents and society"},{"term":"Litigation"},{"term":"Trolls"},{"term":"Licensing"},{"term":"Patentology admin"},{"term":"Claim construction"},{"term":"Legislation"},{"term":"Novelty"},{"term":"Validity"},{"term":"Amendments"},{"term":"Economics"},{"term":"Extensions of time"},{"term":"Extension of patent term"},{"term":"Opposition"},{"term":"FRAND"},{"term":"Strategy"},{"term":"Evidence"},{"term":"Personal"},{"term":"Entitlement"},{"term":"International treaties"},{"term":"Regulations"},{"term":"Compulsory license"},{"term":"Innovation"},{"term":"Public research"},{"term":"UK"},{"term":"Government programs"},{"term":"Inventorship"},{"term":"Competition law"},{"term":"Designs"},{"term":"Federal Court practice"},{"term":"Google"},{"term":"Inventions"},{"term":"Official fees"},{"term":"Canada"},{"term":"Damages"},{"term":"History"},{"term":"Injunctions"},{"term":"PCT"},{"term":"Priority claim"},{"term":"Professional conduct"},{"term":"Accelerated examination"},{"term":"Amazon 1-click"},{"term":"Android"},{"term":"Divisional applications"},{"term":"Prior art"},{"term":"Statistics"},{"term":"WIPO"},{"term":"Biotechnology"},{"term":"Copyright"},{"term":"Indirect infringement"},{"term":"Oracle v Google"},{"term":"Patent filing"},{"term":"Patent pools"},{"term":"Reviews"},{"term":"Scams"},{"term":"Utility\/usefulness"},{"term":"Backlog"},{"term":"Best method\/mode"},{"term":"Funding"},{"term":"High Court"},{"term":"Humour"},{"term":"Microsoft"},{"term":"Ownership"},{"term":"Provisional applications"},{"term":"Reexamination"},{"term":"Revocation"},{"term":"Book review"},{"term":"CCH"},{"term":"China"},{"term":"Confidential information"},{"term":"Crown use"},{"term":"Events"},{"term":"Fair Basis"},{"term":"Fatima Beattie"},{"term":"Fraud"},{"term":"Grace period"},{"term":"Intervening rights"},{"term":"Interview"},{"term":"Japan"},{"term":"Korea"},{"term":"Motorola"},{"term":"Open source"},{"term":"Penalties for Infringement"},{"term":"Plant Breeder's Rights"},{"term":"Privileged communications"},{"term":"Register of Patents"},{"term":"Technology standards"},{"term":"Account of profits"},{"term":"Acquisitions"},{"term":"Apple"},{"term":"Broadband"},{"term":"Cloning"},{"term":"Constitution"},{"term":"Developing world"},{"term":"Double patenting"},{"term":"Electronic communications"},{"term":"Employee inventions"},{"term":"Enablement"},{"term":"Experimental use defence"},{"term":"Extradition"},{"term":"False suggestion"},{"term":"Harmonisation"},{"term":"Inherency"},{"term":"Jurisdiction"},{"term":"Medical research"},{"term":"Patent analytics"},{"term":"Publication"},{"term":"Samsung"},{"term":"Stay of proceedings"},{"term":"Support"},{"term":"Tax incentives"},{"term":"Trademarks"},{"term":"Unity"},{"term":"Unjustified threats"},{"term":"Valuation"},{"term":"Venice"},{"term":"AAT practice"},{"term":"ADR"},{"term":"Amicus curiae"},{"term":"Andrew Christie"},{"term":"Attorney fees"},{"term":"BSKB"},{"term":"Conventions"},{"term":"Costs"},{"term":"Deadlines"},{"term":"Discovery"},{"term":"EU patent"},{"term":"Electronic Transactions Act 1999"},{"term":"Error correction"},{"term":"Estoppel"},{"term":"Evergreening"},{"term":"FOXTEL v TiVo"},{"term":"False marking"},{"term":"IPTA"},{"term":"In-house counsel"},{"term":"Indonesia"},{"term":"Interference"},{"term":"Inventors"},{"term":"Joint infringement"},{"term":"Judicial review"},{"term":"Latin America"},{"term":"Maintenance fees"},{"term":"Marking"},{"term":"Media"},{"term":"Michael Cammarata"},{"term":"Newsbytes"},{"term":"Non-disclosure agreements"},{"term":"Notice to Produce"},{"term":"Nullification of acceptance"},{"term":"Omnibus claims"},{"term":"PPH"},{"term":"Paris Convention"},{"term":"Patent Cooperation Treaty"},{"term":"Patent of addition"},{"term":"Patent specifications"},{"term":"Peer-to-Patent"},{"term":"Philanthropy"},{"term":"Piracy"},{"term":"Prior use defence"},{"term":"Recipes"},{"term":"Regulatory use defence"},{"term":"Remedies"},{"term":"Science"},{"term":"Secret use"},{"term":"Security interests"},{"term":"Shark Tank"},{"term":"Soundbytes"},{"term":"Standard of proof"},{"term":"Stem Cells"},{"term":"Summary judgment"},{"term":"Surrender of patent"},{"term":"Survey"},{"term":"TRIPS"},{"term":"The Asian Century"},{"term":"Trans-Pacific Partnership"},{"term":"Treaties"},{"term":"USITC"},{"term":"Victoria"},{"term":"Vringo"},{"term":"Whole of contents"},{"term":"Yacht racing"},{"term":"ZTE"},{"term":"iOS"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"patentology"},"subtitle":{"type":"html","$t":""},"link":[{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/blog.patentology.com.au\/feeds\/posts\/summary"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/1574330275867774277\/posts\/summary?alt=json-in-script\u0026max-results=5\u0026category=Inventions,Inventions"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/blog.patentology.com.au\/search\/label\/Inventions"},{"rel":"hub","href":"http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/"},{"rel":"next","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/1574330275867774277\/posts\/summary?alt=json-in-script\u0026start-index=6\u0026max-results=5\u0026category=Inventions,Inventions"}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Mark Summerfield"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"32","height":"32","src":"\/\/lh4.googleusercontent.com\/-hzuCrd_SQBY\/AAAAAAAAAAI\/AAAAAAAAC14\/2R-Hb7Z8zys\/s512-c\/photo.jpg"}}],"generator":{"version":"7.00","uri":"http://www.blogger.com","$t":"Blogger"},"openSearch$totalResults":{"$t":"8"},"openSearch$startIndex":{"$t":"1"},"openSearch$itemsPerPage":{"$t":"5"},"entry":[{"id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1574330275867774277.post-7080667615308746163"},"published":{"$t":"2014-05-25T20:46:00.000+10:00"},"updated":{"$t":"2014-05-25T21:02:46.121+10:00"},"category":[{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Appeal"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Claim construction"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Examination"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Inventions"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Patent Office"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Patentable subject matter"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"‘Why Do I Need a Patent Attorney?’"},"summary":{"type":"text","$t":"\n‘I hesitate not to pronounce, that every man who is his own lawyer, has a fool for a client’ – an unknown lawyer, early 19th century.\n\nWhile the above is often regarded, cynically, as a self-serving proverb promulgated by the legal profession, for better or worse it is almost always true.  There may be no other profession for which lay people are more inclined to persuade themselves that they do"},"link":[{"rel":"replies","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/blog.patentology.com.au\/2014\/05\/why-do-i-need-patent-attorney.html#comment-form","title":"11 Comments"},{"rel":"edit","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/1574330275867774277\/posts\/default\/7080667615308746163"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/1574330275867774277\/posts\/default\/7080667615308746163"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/blog.patentology.com.au\/2014\/05\/why-do-i-need-patent-attorney.html","title":"‘Why Do I Need a Patent Attorney?’"}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Mark Summerfield"},"uri":{"$t":"https:\/\/plus.google.com\/116299882295651429004"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"32","height":"32","src":"\/\/lh4.googleusercontent.com\/-hzuCrd_SQBY\/AAAAAAAAAAI\/AAAAAAAAC14\/2R-Hb7Z8zys\/s512-c\/photo.jpg"}}],"media$thumbnail":{"xmlns$media":"http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/","url":"http:\/\/lh3.ggpht.com\/-YAVYETN_JT8\/U4HJROfJSxI\/AAAAAAAADBc\/9kxXjO4Jx_w\/s72-c\/Invention%25255B4%25255D.png?imgmax=800","height":"72","width":"72"},"thr$total":{"$t":"11"}},{"id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1574330275867774277.post-3259673584168895895"},"published":{"$t":"2014-03-08T14:25:00.000+11:00"},"updated":{"$t":"2014-03-12T13:40:23.360+11:00"},"category":[{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Inventions"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Inventors"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Patents and society"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"Women Inventors and their Inventions"},"summary":{"type":"text","$t":"Today, 8 March, is International Women’s Day, and all of March it is Womens' History Month.\n\nIt seems to me that when people think of inventors, they mostly think of men.  And when they think of inventions, they mostly think of inventions made by men.  There are some obvious real-life examples, like the Wright brothers and the airplane, Alexander Graham Bell and the telephone, Guglielmo Marconi –"},"link":[{"rel":"replies","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/blog.patentology.com.au\/2014\/03\/women-inventors-and-their-inventions.html#comment-form","title":"0 Comments"},{"rel":"edit","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/1574330275867774277\/posts\/default\/3259673584168895895"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/1574330275867774277\/posts\/default\/3259673584168895895"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/blog.patentology.com.au\/2014\/03\/women-inventors-and-their-inventions.html","title":"Women Inventors and their Inventions"}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Mark Summerfield"},"uri":{"$t":"https:\/\/plus.google.com\/116299882295651429004"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"32","height":"32","src":"\/\/lh4.googleusercontent.com\/-hzuCrd_SQBY\/AAAAAAAAAAI\/AAAAAAAAC14\/2R-Hb7Z8zys\/s512-c\/photo.jpg"}}],"media$thumbnail":{"xmlns$media":"http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/","url":"http:\/\/lh6.ggpht.com\/-dU-E7XkTbRM\/UxqNH6uIC0I\/AAAAAAAAC6c\/zkZwOzU3EqA\/s72-c\/International%252520Women%252527s%252520Day%25255B4%25255D.png?imgmax=800","height":"72","width":"72"},"thr$total":{"$t":"0"}},{"id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1574330275867774277.post-325362870295381037"},"published":{"$t":"2012-04-07T13:35:00.000+10:00"},"updated":{"$t":"2012-04-07T13:35:17.162+10:00"},"category":[{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Australia"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Inventions"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Licensing"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Politics"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Public research"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Trolls"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"Five Reasons Why Ars Technica’s Savaging of CSIRO is Appalling"},"summary":{"type":"text","$t":"A few days ago Ars Technica published a piece by Joe Mullin entitled ‘How the Aussie government \"invented WiFi\" and sued its way to $430 million’.  At around the same time, we published a post on the same topic – the CSIRO WLAN patent settlement – broadly based on the same facts, and yet of a very different nature (see The Story Behind CSIRO’s Wi-Fi Patent ‘Windfall’).\n\nThe fact of the matter is "},"link":[{"rel":"replies","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/blog.patentology.com.au\/2012\/04\/five-reasons-why-ars-technicas-savaging.html#comment-form","title":"20 Comments"},{"rel":"edit","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/1574330275867774277\/posts\/default\/325362870295381037"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/1574330275867774277\/posts\/default\/325362870295381037"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/blog.patentology.com.au\/2012\/04\/five-reasons-why-ars-technicas-savaging.html","title":"Five Reasons Why Ars Technica’s Savaging of CSIRO is Appalling"}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Mark Summerfield"},"uri":{"$t":"https:\/\/plus.google.com\/116299882295651429004"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"32","height":"32","src":"\/\/lh4.googleusercontent.com\/-hzuCrd_SQBY\/AAAAAAAAAAI\/AAAAAAAAC14\/2R-Hb7Z8zys\/s512-c\/photo.jpg"}}],"media$thumbnail":{"xmlns$media":"http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/","url":"http:\/\/lh5.ggpht.com\/-2ZJGPSfQLr8\/T3-1rL_90FI\/AAAAAAAAAuY\/SW36YGmN1NE\/s72-c\/Rant_thumb%25255B1%25255D.png?imgmax=800","height":"72","width":"72"},"thr$total":{"$t":"20"}},{"id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1574330275867774277.post-970396974773209358"},"published":{"$t":"2012-04-05T02:03:00.000+10:00"},"updated":{"$t":"2012-04-05T02:03:50.567+10:00"},"category":[{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Australia"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Inventions"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Licensing"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"News"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Patent litigation"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Public research"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"The Story Behind CSIRO’s Wi-Fi Patent ‘Windfall’"},"summary":{"type":"text","$t":"windfall: noun 1. something blown down by the wind, as fruit. 2. An unexpected piece of good fortune. (Source: The Macquarie Dictionary.)\n\nAs has been widely reported in recent days, Australia’s CSIRO has settled outstanding patent claims against US telecommunications companies including AT\u0026T, Verizon and T-Mobile for around $220 million.  The case against these companies has been ongoing for "},"link":[{"rel":"replies","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/blog.patentology.com.au\/2012\/04\/story-behind-csiros-wi-fi-patent.html#comment-form","title":"4 Comments"},{"rel":"edit","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/1574330275867774277\/posts\/default\/970396974773209358"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/1574330275867774277\/posts\/default\/970396974773209358"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/blog.patentology.com.au\/2012\/04\/story-behind-csiros-wi-fi-patent.html","title":"The Story Behind CSIRO’s Wi-Fi Patent ‘Windfall’"}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Mark Summerfield"},"uri":{"$t":"https:\/\/plus.google.com\/116299882295651429004"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"32","height":"32","src":"\/\/lh4.googleusercontent.com\/-hzuCrd_SQBY\/AAAAAAAAAAI\/AAAAAAAAC14\/2R-Hb7Z8zys\/s512-c\/photo.jpg"}}],"media$thumbnail":{"xmlns$media":"http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/","url":"http:\/\/lh6.ggpht.com\/-YTGGphOLi_g\/T3xwn5p-SHI\/AAAAAAAAAtQ\/Qvz_nKLM0kQ\/s72-c\/Wi-Fi%252520Logo%25255B4%25255D.png?imgmax=800","height":"72","width":"72"},"thr$total":{"$t":"4"}},{"id":{"$t":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1574330275867774277.post-8517882605730731596"},"published":{"$t":"2010-12-01T10:45:00.000+11:00"},"updated":{"$t":"2010-12-01T10:45:38.127+11:00"},"category":[{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"History"},{"scheme":"http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#","term":"Inventions"}],"title":{"type":"text","$t":"LED Innovator Dies, Age 83"},"summary":{"type":"text","$t":"\n\nProfessor Neumark\n(Picture: Columbia University)\n\n\nA recent obituary reporting the passing of Gertude Neumark Rothschild, from heart failure at the respectable age of 83 years, caught our attention for at least three reasons.\n\n\n\nFirstly, she was a Professor of materials science and engineering at Columbia University, where she made important advances in wide bandgap semiconductors which were "},"link":[{"rel":"replies","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/blog.patentology.com.au\/2010\/12\/led-innovator-dies-age-83.html#comment-form","title":"0 Comments"},{"rel":"edit","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/1574330275867774277\/posts\/default\/8517882605730731596"},{"rel":"self","type":"application/atom+xml","href":"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/feeds\/1574330275867774277\/posts\/default\/8517882605730731596"},{"rel":"alternate","type":"text/html","href":"http:\/\/blog.patentology.com.au\/2010\/12\/led-innovator-dies-age-83.html","title":"LED Innovator Dies, Age 83"}],"author":[{"name":{"$t":"Mark Summerfield"},"uri":{"$t":"https:\/\/plus.google.com\/116299882295651429004"},"email":{"$t":"noreply@blogger.com"},"gd$image":{"rel":"http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail","width":"32","height":"32","src":"\/\/lh4.googleusercontent.com\/-hzuCrd_SQBY\/AAAAAAAAAAI\/AAAAAAAAC14\/2R-Hb7Z8zys\/s512-c\/photo.jpg"}}],"media$thumbnail":{"xmlns$media":"http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/","url":"http:\/\/3.bp.blogspot.com\/_1P-Lzt0A2aE\/TPWL6p2r3vI\/AAAAAAAAALA\/uhcm5veIlxA\/s72-c\/Prof-Neumark.jpg","height":"72","width":"72"},"thr$total":{"$t":"0"}}]}});