Professor Neumark (Picture: Columbia University) |
Secondly, Professor Neumark (as she was known professionally) obtained patents on aspects of her research, which in 2005 she successfully asserted against a number of companies, including the Philips Lumileds Lighting Company, Epistar, Toyoda Gosei and Osram. More recently, in 2008, she filed complaints with the US International Trade Commission (ITC) against numerous companies, including such luminaries (pardon the pun) as Sony, Nokia and Hitachi.
All in all, according to her former lawyer, she secured more than US$27 million in settlements and licensing fees from over 40 companies.
Not least, however, we were impressed by her achievement of all this within a male-dominated field, and after her jewish family had fled Nazi Germany for the US in 1935. As Professor Neumark was reported as saying in 2008, 'I just want recognition for the work that I did, and I want to show that women can do science.'
Well, of course women can do science, although it is telling that this still needs to be said in the 21st century. Professor Neumark also proved it by example. Vale and RIP.
To read more:
- Obituary in the New York Times.
- US Patent No. 4,904,618, 'Process for doping crystals of wide band gap semiconductors'.
- US Patent No. 5,252,499, 'Wide band-gap semiconductors having low bipolar resistivity and method of formation'.
Before You Go…
Thank you for reading this article to the end – I hope you enjoyed it, and found it useful. Almost every article I post here takes a few hours of my time to research and write, and I have never felt the need to ask for anything in return.
But now – for the first, and perhaps only, time – I am asking for a favour. If you are a patent attorney, examiner, or other professional who is experienced in reading and interpreting patent claims, I could really use your help with my PhD research. My project involves applying artificial intelligence to analyse patent claim scope systematically, with the goal of better understanding how different legal and regulatory choices influence the boundaries of patent protection. But I need data to train my models, and that is where you can potentially assist me. If every qualified person who reads this request could spare just a couple of hours over the next few weeks, I could gather all the data I need.
The task itself is straightforward and web-based – I am asking participants to compare pairs of patent claims and evaluate their relative scope, using an online application that I have designed and implemented over the past few months. No special knowledge is required beyond the ability to read and understand patent claims in technical fields with which you are familiar. You might even find it to be fun!
There is more information on the project website, at claimscopeproject.net. In particular, you can read:
- a detailed description of the study, its goals and benefits; and
- instructions for the use of the online claim comparison application.
Thank you for considering this request!
Mark Summerfield
0 comments:
Post a Comment